This course provides instruction in basic and advanced experimental photographic processes. Students will conduct projects which explore the conceptual, thematic and technical aspects of these processes. Students will gain skills in range of experimental photographic processes and techniques and have the opportunity to explore areas of interest through the development of individual projects. Experimentation with materials, scale and creative problem solving are encouraged. Students will individually research the contexts and concepts relevant to their projects. Workplace health and safety instruction is an integral part of this course.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- competently utilise a range of skills relevant to the discipline, in response to Workshop projects;
- demonstrate the creative analysis and exploration of material/s used in Workshop projects;
- investigate the application of concepts and processes in collaborative and professional contexts; and
- show a critical awareness of historical and theoretical contexts relevant to Workshop projects.
Recommended Resources
Whether you are on campus or studying remotely, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.
ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.
Staff Feedback
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
Student Feedback
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.
Class Schedule
Week/Session | Summary of Activities | Assessment |
---|---|---|
1 | Introduction to the course: Course outline, structure, materials and assessments. Camera-less Photography | Assessment Task 1 introduced |
2 | Cyanotypes | |
3 | The Altered Image - Chemical intervention | |
4 | The Altered Image - Physical intervention | |
5 | Supervised studio practice and feedback | |
6 | Presentations for Assessment Task 1 Introduction to Assessment Task 2 Moving Stills | Assessment Task 1 due Introduction to Assessment Task 2 |
7 | Introduction to Assessment Task 3 Supervised studio practice and feedback | |
8 | Supervised studio practice and feedback | |
9 | Presentations for Assessment Task 2 Supervised studio practice and feedback | Assessment Task 2 due |
10 | Supervised studio practice and feedback | |
11 | Supervised studio practice and feedback | |
12 | Group critique in preparation for submission of major studio project | |
13 | EXAM PERIOD - No class | Assessment Task 3 due |
Assessment Summary
Assessment task | Value | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|
Portfolio of Studio Work | 25 % | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Moving Stills | 15 % | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Independent Major Project | 40 % | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Reflective Essay | 20 % | 2, 3, 4 |
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
Policies
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
- Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
- Special Assessment Consideration Guideline and General Information
- Student Surveys and Evaluations
- Deferred Examinations
- Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
- Code of practice for teaching and learning
Assessment Requirements
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4
Portfolio of Studio Work
During Week 1 to 6 you will be exploring various forms of experimental photographic processes.
Present your investigations in a portfolio/visual diary along with references. This may include the work of photographers and artists, as well as articles, books, movies etc. which relate to your work.
Provide a 100 word written reflection on each of the investigations you’ve conducted covering things such as:
- The process involved
- What you have discovered
- What you could have improved
- Your thoughts on this form of image making
Presentation requirements:
In Week 6 you will be required to verbally present your work and contextualise it for the class in 3-5 minutes.
Value: 25%
Rubric
CRITERIA | HD 80-100 | D 70-79 | CR 60-69 | P 50-59 | <> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilisation of a range of skills in the completion of the task | Exhibition of initiative in the utilisation of a range of skills conducted at a high level. | Initiative shown using a range of skills in the completion of the task. | Most skills are competently utilised in the completion of the task. | Limited utilisation of skills in the completion of the task. | Skills utilised in the completion of the task are below standard. |
Independent exploration of materials and techniques | Demonstration of a strong level of independent exploration and alternative ways of thinking. | Demonstration of a significant level of independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Demonstration of some independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Limited independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Insufficient exploration of materials and techniques. |
Active participation and investigation of workshop content | A high level of active participation and investigation of the workshop content. | Significant participation and investigation of the workshop content. | Competent participation and investigation of the workshop content. | Participation and investigation of the workshop content only when directed. | Insufficient participation and investigation of the workshop content. |
Engagement with historical and theoretical contexts | A high level of critical engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A significant level of engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A competent level of engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Limited engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Insufficient engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. |
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4
Moving Stills
For this assessment task you will investigate the creation of the moving image using still images.
Create three GIFs or Cinemagraph animations using found images, photographs you’ve taken or a combination of the two.
Each of the individual animations you create must relate to each other in some way. The chosen theme of the series is entirely up to you.
In the creation of the animated works you will:
- Explore various techniques and processes used to create a moving image work from stills
- Develop and/or source images to create a unique final series of moving image work
- Consider the historical and theoretical context of the still and moving image
Presentation Requirements:
In Week 9 you will be required to verbally present your work and contextualise it for the class in 3-5 minutes.
After your presentation upload your animations to Wattle as MP4 files along with a 200 word artist statement.
Value: 15%
Rubric
CRITERIA | HD 80-100 | D 70-79 | CR 60-69 | P 50-59 | <> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilisation of a range of skills in the completion of the task | Exhibition of initiative and a range of skills conducted at a high level. | Initiative shown using a range of skills in the completion of the task. | Most skills are competently utilised in the completion of the task. | Limited utilisation of skills in the completion of the task. | Skills utilised in the completion of the task are below standard. |
Independent exploration of various techniques | Demonstration of a strong level of independent exploration and alternative ways of thinking. | Demonstration of a significant level of independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Demonstration of some independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Limited independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Insufficient exploration of materials and techniques. |
Originality and the presentation of the work in its final outcome | A unique and strongly presented final outcome which is highly resolved. | A well-presented final outcome requiring minor improvements. | A competent final outcome requiring some improvements. | A satisfactory final outcome requiring improvements. | A final outcome which is below standard and requires significant improvements. |
Engagement with historical and theoretical contexts | A high level of critical engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A significant level of engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A competent level of engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Limited engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Insufficient engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. |
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4
Independent Major Project
For this project you will independently research an experimental photographic process which you will use to create a series of 5-10 images. The images created will be based
on a theme of your choice.
Presentation requirements:
5-10 prints exploring your chosen theme. The prints created need to be 8 x 10 inches or larger. Provide a 200-300 word artist statement to accompany
your work.
Submit your prints during the examination period. The date of this will be confirmed in Week 7.
Value: 40%
Rubric
CRITERIA | HD 80-100 | D 70-79 | CR 60-69 | P 50-59 | <> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilisation of a range of skills in the completion of the task | Exhibition of initiative in the utilisation of a range of skills conducted at a high level. | Initiative shown using a range of skills in the completion of the task. | Most skills are competently utilised in the completion of the task. | Limited utilisation of skills in the completion of the task. | Skills utilised in the completion of the task are below standard. |
Independent exploration of materials and techniques | Demonstration of a strong level of independent exploration and alternative ways of thinking. | Demonstration of a significant level of independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Demonstration of some independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Limited independent exploration of materials and techniques. | Insufficient exploration of materials and techniques. |
Engagement with historical and theoretical contexts | A high level of critical engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A significant level of engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A competent level of engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Limited engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Insufficient engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. |
Originality and the presentation of the work in its final outcome | A unique and strongly presented final outcome which is highly resolved. | A well-presented final outcome requiring minor improvements. | A competent final outcome requiring some improvements. | A satisfactory final outcome requiring improvements. | A final outcome which is below standard and requires significant improvements. |
Assessment Task 4
Learning Outcomes: 2, 3, 4
Reflective Essay
For Assessment Task 4 you will write a 1500 word reflective essay on your project for Assessment Task 3. The purpose of the reflective essay is to assess your understanding
of the principles underpinning your project and the creative processes involved in its production.
Start gathering material for the reflective essay as soon as you decide on your project idea. Keep notes concerning the rationale behind your idea and identify potential
problems as well as other texts and examples of creative works which have influenced you. You can continue this process of reflecting on your creative ideas and the progress of your work in a sketchbook, blog or notebook. You should read and take notes on texts and work which relate to your own project. This may include films, websites, music, novels or academic texts.
Your reflective essay should cover the following areas:
- Where did your original idea come from?
- How did you adapt and develop your idea? [Examine the research and production process, providing explanations for decisions taken]
- What research did you undertake? How did you incorporate this material?
- How does your work compare with or relate to professional work in the same field, tradition or style? Perhaps your work may draw on genres, visual languages and styles
found in other media? Or perhaps you were inspired by artists discussed in the seminars?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of your project? What challenges did you face? What did you learn from this process?
Your Reflective Essay should be:
- Clear and concise in expression
- Word processed, double spaced, with margins
- Grammatically correct and free from spelling errors
- You may write in the first person, but take care not to use conversational language or slang
- Correctly referenced, including a bibliography all books, websites, films and other materials listed
Value: 20%
Rubric
CRITERIA | HD 80-100 | D 70-79 | CR 60-69 | P 50-59 | <> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding of the principles and creative processes related to the project | A strong understanding of the principles and creative processes related to the project is demonstrated. | A significant understanding of the principles and creative processes related to the project is demonstrated. | A competent understanding of the principles and creative processes related to the project is demonstrated. | A limited understanding of the principles and creative processes related to the project is demonstrated. | An insufficient understanding of the principles and creative processes related to the project is demonstrated. |
Communication of ideas and critical thinking in relation to the content | Strong communication and a demonstration of a high level of critical thinking. | Significant communication and a good demonstration of critical thinking. | Competent communication and some demonstration of critical thinking. | Limited communication and minimal demonstration of critical thinking. | Poor communication and insufficient demonstration of critical thinking. |
Research and engagement with historical and theoretical contexts | A high level of research demonstration a strong engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A significant level of research demonstrating a good engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A competent level of research demonstrating an engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | A limited amount of research with basic engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. | Insufficient research with minimal engagement with historical and theoretical contexts. |
Structure, grammar and referencing | A well-constructed written work with the correct use of grammar and referencing. | A highly competent written work with minimal errors in grammar and referencing. | A competent written work with minimal errors in grammar and referencing. | A satisfactory written work with errors in grammar and referencing. | A below standard written work with errors in grammar and referencing. |
Academic Integrity
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.
The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.
The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.
The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.
Online Submission
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
Hardcopy Submission
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Late Submission
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
- Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
Referencing Requirements
The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Privacy Notice
The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Access and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
Convener
![]() |
|
|||
Research Interests |
Melissa Howe
![]() |
|
Instructor
![]() |
|
|||
Research Interests |
Melissa Howe
![]() |
|